Why We Retested the Halo Focus UV Light

As UV lashing continues to grow, so do the questions around safety, testing, and proper use. And honestly, that is a good thing.

When artists ask better questions, the industry moves forward.

That is exactly why we chose to retest the Halo Focus UV Light. Not because something was wrong, but because clarity matters, standards evolve, and trust is built through action, not assumptions.

Why retesting matters: Retesting ensures safety data reflects how a product is actually used today, not just how it was tested in the past.

The Industry Is Asking for More and We Agree

Over time, we saw a clear shift in industry conversations:

• More questions about working distance
• More scrutiny around safety classifications
• More concern about how testing is performed and communicated

Rather than dismissing these concerns or relying on older testing alone, we felt it was important to meet the industry where it is now.

Retesting was not about checking a box. It was about aligning safety data with real world use and current expectations.

Why Distance Was Central to Retesting

Photobiological safety is not just about the light itself. It is about how the light is used.

Distance plays a critical role in exposure levels. A light tested at one distance can produce very different results if used closer or farther away. That is why photobiological testing is always performed at a defined working distance that reflects intended use.

When we retested the Halo Focus, we wanted the data to reflect:

• How professionals actually work
• Our recommended usage protocols
• A realistic working distance from a fully closed eye

This ensures the conclusions drawn from testing are meaningful and applicable.

Retesting Was Also About Preventing Misinterpretation

We chose to retest because we have seen how easily technical safety data can be misunderstood when shared without context.

Photobiological classifications are distance dependent. When that detail is overlooked, it can lead to incorrect assumptions about safety categories.

The reality is that any light, regardless of brand, can fall into a different safety classification if it is used outside of its recommended distance. Even lights considered exempt can shift into higher risk groups when used improperly.

Clear testing at a defined distance helps prevent confusion before it starts.

What We Provide for Documentation

For artists, salons, or regulatory bodies requesting formal documentation, we provide a Photobiological Safety Summary based on accredited IEC 62471 testing.

This documentation:

• Confirms testing was completed by an accredited lab
• Clearly states the tested working distance
• Summarizes results in a standardized, interpretable format

It is the appropriate document for reviewing safety compliance without the risk of misreading raw laboratory data.

Our Commitment to Trust and Transparency

Retesting the Halo Focus was a proactive decision rooted in responsibility.

We believe transparency should reduce fear, not create it. Safety claims should always include context. Brands should evolve alongside the professionals who use their products.

As UV lashing grows, so does our commitment to testing, education, and honest communication.

Because trust is not built once. It is maintained.

If you would like to see the latest test results, shoot us an email at info@evlolash.com.